The Dress Test for Leadership: Why Vague Strategies Split Teams

Do you remember The Dress controversy?

Back in 2015 a washed-out photo of a striped dress split the web: half the planet saw blue-black, the rest swore it was white-gold.

I recently came across an article that explained why so many of us conclusively saw something so different. Scientists found two key drivers: (1) the photo was low quality, forcing our brain’s visual system to “repair” missing data, and (2) people’s repairs depended on the light they were used to. Regular daylight dwellers mentally subtracted bluish light and perceived white-gold; night owls tended to discount yellowish bulbs and landed on blue-black. The real split was experience-driven guesswork by the predictive brain, which constantly fills gaps with prior knowledge to keep perception running smoothly. 

That same shortcut shows up whenever leaders drop a half-lit strategy note.

Imagine headquarters announces, “We must win with Gen Z on our new sneaker line.”

  • Supply-chain, burned by past stock-outs, reads that as “flood stores with inventory.”

  • Brand, inspired by hype culture, hears “keep it scarce to build desire.”

  • Merchandising, chasing volume targets, assumes “price it lower so everyone can afford a pair.”

Three teams, three opposite plays—each convinced it’s right—because the original “strategy” was vague and left critical context on the cutting-room floor. The company ends up debating colors instead of stitching the dress.

How to keep everyone seeing the same hue

  1. Name the light source. Spell out what “win” means: 20% market share among 18–24-year-olds by holiday, with an average sell-through target of 85% in the first four weeks.

  2. Expose the trade-offs. Share a one-page matrix that shows how inventory depth, price, and drop cadence interact. Now every team edits from the same script.

  3. Run a “dress test.” Before launch, ask reps from functions like operations, marketing, and finance to paraphrase the plan. Divergent recaps signal missing light. Add detail until their stories match.

  4. Keep the story current. As assumptions evolve (demand spike, cost swing), update the source doc and flag changes so nobody’s acting on yesterday’s shadows.

When you supply the missing pixels up front, your teams stop guessing—and start executing—in the same direction.

Next
Next

Why the Best Leaders Start in the Back Row